Yesterday I became privy to an assumption that I had heard before while in a discussion with my partners but never really crossed my mind. In an office of four men under the age of 35, one could imagine that women are a frequent topic of discussion for us, and yesterday was no different. I was antagonized by one of my partners because in this week I had expressed an attraction to two women under the age of 20 (don’t be alarmed, they were legal), and I used the age-old phrase “if there’s grass on the field then play ball.” But then I had to correct myself because I prefer a vagina with a minimal amount of hair if any at all. Which brought the response, “how can you say that you like a shaved cooter, doesn’t that remind you of a little girls va-jay-jay?” I sat about it and thought for a minute, thinking that outside of changing diapers for family members and friends of mine, I had never seen the privates of anyone less than the age of 14. (I’m talking when I was 15, before yall think something is wrong with me) Now I posed the question of whether preferring a shaven cooch makes me a pervert to a friend of mine and she responded that I more than likely prefer it shaved because:
1. makes it more visually stimulating thus mouthwatering
2. the hair doesn't bother your face
3. it's quite porn-ish
4. it's clean looking.
All of these reasons fell directly with my logic, but then my partners posed a question to me which has me in slump; if I were to see a picture of a prepubescent cooter and a baldly shaven one, would I be able to tell the difference? I think that I could but I’m not sure…I know that I think too much, but this one is really bothering me.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment